The author critically examines a disconnect between the NCTM's professional standards and the way that textbook authors present information. Some of the points she makes that I found most interesting:
- When asking "questions", textbooks use imperatives (Do, Make, Study, Organize) to encourage them to discover mathematical concepts. There aren't really questions at all.
- Texts make assumptions about student knowledge (eg. In your earlier work, you saw that linear relationships can be described by equations of the form y = mx + b). Is this really different from just stating mathematical facts?
- If a teacher changes something in the textbook, it may diminish the authority of the textbook, but also imply that the teacher has knowledge about students' actual abilities and prior knowledge
If I were to ask the author a question (which I suppose I may do,) I would be interested in her opinion on flipped classrooms - this is a model that is being explored in some schools where students are encouraged to do their learning at home, and their 'homework' at school. Students engage in a text or online resource to learn the material, and do the practice work in class with support of peers and teachers. This emphasized the importance of the text on initial learning, but allows students to have more support while attempting to analyze and expand upon their learning.
Hi David,
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting that you mention your experience working with textbooks, an in particular noticing your colleagues following textbooks very closely. I read an article over the weekend discussing how a seemingly perfect classroom can in fact be detrimental to student learning. This seems to be particularly relevant in the case of a textbook; the "perfect" learning device that has anything and everything a student needs to "succeed" in a course. To me, I find it exciting to push the textbook away and cause a bit of a mathematical mess. I personally think that it allows students to feel a little more connected to the mathematics, rather than feeling that it all comes from some superior authority.
I would also be curious to hear her response on the flipped classroom. This is a big topic of discussion within university mathematics education, and a topic I'm quite divided on. I honestly don't know how I feel about it, and feel like I can't make a justified decision until I've actually tried it out (on one side or the other).
Seems like it was an interesting article! One of my professors last term said that if we needed a textbook to teach math, we shouldn't teach math at all. He was saying this more in terms of knowing the content, but I think this too applies to knowing your students. Textbooks weren't created for particular schools or particular classes or particular students. It is a teacher's job to find what works best for their students and themselves, and teach in that way.
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of flipped classrooms, but I am not sure how practical it is for all students. I think this might only work with particular classes and/or students.